Characterization of low energy argon recoils with ReD and ReD+
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract The Recoil Directionality project (ReD) within the DarkSide-20k Collaboration characterized the response of a liquid argon (LAr) dual-phase Time Projection Chamber (TPC) to neutron induced nuclear recoils, to measure the ionization yield at low-energy. The ionization yield is a critical parameter for the experiments searching for Dark Matter in the form of low-mass WIMPs and measurements in Ar below 10 keV are scarce in the literature. ReD was designed to cover the gap down to 2 keV. The ReD data taking took place in 2023 at the INFN Sezione di Catania. The TPC was irradiated by neutrons from an intense 252Cf fission source in order to produce Ar recoils in the energy range of interest. The energy of the nuclear recoils produced within the TPC by (n,n') scattering was determined by detecting the outgoing neutrons with a dedicated neutron spectrometer made of 18 plastic scintillators. The kinetic energy of neutrons interacting in the TPC was evaluated event-by-event by measuring the time of flight. ReD collected and characterized a sample of nuclear recoils down to 2 keV, thus meeting its design goal. The ReD effort will be further extended by a new project, ReD+, funded by a PRIN grant from the Italian Ministry of Research. ReD+ is designed to push the sensitivity down to 0.5 keV, by using the same conceptual design of ReD and improved components. A new TPC is being re-designed and optimized in order to increase the signal rate and the signal-to-background ratio, which limited the sensitivity of ReD.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Characterization of low energy argon recoils with ReD and ReD+
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2025
- Éditeur
- IOP Publishing
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.