Longitudinal Assessment of QT Apex in Tumor-Bearing Dogs Receiving Doxorubicin Monotherapy
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Background The cardiac morphologic and functional derangements induced by doxorubicin (DOX) are referred to as DOX-induced cardiotoxicity (DOX-IC). Prolongation of the QT apex (QTa) has been identified as a potential marker for the early detection of DOX-IC in humans. Objectives Describe changes in QTa that occur in dogs with cancer undergoing DOX monotherapy. Animals Forty-five client-owned dogs. Methods Descriptive analysis of data routinely recorded as part of case management of dogs with cancer. Dogs included in the study had a confirmed malignant neoplasm, received DOX as a monotherapy, and had at least 4 ECGs > 30 s. All ECGs included in the study were recorded before DOX administration. Five heartbeats with a stable signal and minimal artifact were randomly selected from each dog, and the QTa was blindly evaluated in lead II, lead III, or both. Subsequently, a linear mixed model was used to quantify the effect of a cumulative dose of DOX on the QTa interval, adjusting for the effect of the other clinical variables. Results Forty-five dogs met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 39/45 received five DOX treatments and 26/45 received six DOX treatments. For ECG analysis, 234 ECGs were evaluated for changes in the QTa. The average cumulative dose of DOX was 154.1 mg/m2. There was no significant impact of the DOX treatments on the change in QTa (p = 0.8). Conclusions Administration of DOX up to a cumulative dose of 154.1 mg/m2 does not result in QTa prolongation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Longitudinal Assessment of QT Apex in Tumor-Bearing Dogs Receiving Doxorubicin Monotherapy
- Date Crossref
- 01/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.