Attitudes and Perceptions of University Students and Postdoctoral Fellows in the Medical and Life Sciences Towards the Use of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in the Educational Process: A Large-Scale, International Cross-Sectional Survey
Rattachement africain : ca, de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Background Artificial intelligence chatbots (AICs) are advanced systems capable of generating and processing human-like text, and are being increasingly integrated in various fields, including education. Despite their potential to significantly impact learning, little is known about university students’ and postdoctoral fellows’ (US&PD) views on AICs in educational settings. This study investigated the familiarity, perceptions, and factors influencing adoption of AICs by US&PDs in the life and medical sciences. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional online survey. Recruitment involved two approaches: (1) using R script on PubMED metadata to extract contact details of corresponding authors with recent MEDLINE-indexed publications, and (2) collecting publicly listed contact information of program administrators from the top 50 global, English-speaking universities, as ranked by the Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) list. Both authors and administrators were contacted and requested to forward the survey to US&PDs. The survey was administered via SurveyMonkey from February 2 to March 18, 2024, with two reminder emails sent between February 14 and 26, 2024. Results A total of 1,209 responses were analyzed. Most respondents identified as female (62.07%) and were enrolled in doctoral (40.48%) or master’s programs (17.55%). Over 63% were familiar with AICs, with ChatGPT being the most used (60.3%). While many recognized the educational value of AICs, concerns about reliability and integration into academia persisted. Calls for more training and institutional support were common. Conclusions The study underscores the potential and challenges of AICs in education. While enthusiasm exists, significant concerns remain about their implementation, requiring targeted training and policy development.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Attitudes and Perceptions of University Students and Postdoctoral Fellows in the Medical and Life Sciences Towards the Use of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in the Educational Process: A Large-Scale, International Cross-Sectional Survey
- Date Crossref
- 26/06/2025
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Ottawa Hospital Ottawa Methods Centre pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
University Children's Hospital Tübingen pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Bosch Health Campus pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
University of Tübingen pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Robert Bosch (Germany) pays non établi dans la noticeEntreprise
-
Impact pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisation à but non lucratif
-
McMaster University Department of Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Ottawa pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University Hospital Tubingen Institute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Robert Bosch Center for Integrative Medicine and Health pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Health Research Methods pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Ottawa Methods Centre — Ottawa Hospital, University Children's Hospital Tübingen et Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, avec 9 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.