Exploring Reproductive Violence in a Moroccan Context: A Stakeholder informed Delphi Study

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background Reproductive violence (RV) is not currently recognised as a legally or epistemically distinct category of gender-based violence. While reproductive coercion (RC) as a subset of RV is gaining increased recognition within the literature, studies are predominantly focused on RC as a form of intimate partner abuse. This is despite evidence that actions taken to impede reproductive autonomy can be perpetrated at family, community, and even state level. The current study, based in Morocco, firstly aimed to examine how RV is influenced by social and cultural context. We then use this knowledge to develop a series of item statements for inclusion in a newly developed RC and RV screening tool. Methods A Delphi study was conducted with an international panel of 11 experts in the field of gender-based violence prevention and sexual and reproductive health. The study consisted of two rounds, with 90% of respondents completing all two surveys. Experts were asked to rate 33 item statements relating to forms of reproductive coercion and violence that women in Morocco may face across a five-point scale ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Participants were encouraged to clarify their rating with open text responses. A 75% agreement rate was used as threshold for consensus. Results A consensus was reached for items describing the different forms of reproductive coercion and violence that women in Morocco may face. Statements largely consisted of three categories: interpersonal, institutional, and social norms. Conclusions Using contextualised screening tools for reproductive coercion and violence that consider context specific gender and social norms allows for a deeper understanding of gender-based violence in Morocco. Following further testing, this screening tool has the potential to increase the visibility of RV, inform more targeted and effective interventions, and strengthen both screening and monitoring and evaluation. The current study represents a crucial first step in the development of such a screening tool.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.