Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

A cross-sectional investigation of the ophthalmological impact of loiasis in Cameroon, Central Africa

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
7Institutions déclarées
3Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : Cameroun, us, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Current knowledge of ocular manifestations of loiasis is limited to the transient subconjunctival passage of the adult filaria and anecdotal reports of posterior segment lesions. Therefore, the ocular burden of loiasis is likely underestimated since it has never been systematically assessed at the population level. We aimed to evaluate the relationship of Loa loa microfilaremia and recent eye worm passage with chronic ocular lesions identified through comprehensive ophthalmological assessment in an endemic area. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Subjects aged ≥ 15 years, residing in Akonolinga for ≥ 5 years, without filaricidal treatment for ≥3 years, were screened for filariases. After excluding participants with onchocerciasis lesions, a subset of randomly selected participants was assessed by ophthalmologists blinded to blood test results then allocated to four groups defined by microfilarial load (MFL) on calibrated thick blood film: G1 (Loa MFL = 0), G2 (MFL < 8000/mL), G3 (MFL ≥ 8000/mL), G4 (co-infestation with Mansonella MFL > 100/mL). The ophthalmological assessment comprised distance visual acuity, examination of the anterior segment with a slit lamp, and fundoscopy. The primary analysis consisted of univariable comparisons of the frequency of abnormal findings across four groups (G1 - 4) or two groups defined by history of eye worm passage. The secondary analysis consisted of a multivariable logistic regression analysis of the relationship of high Loa MFL (≥8000/mL) with chorioretinitis and eye worm passage with unilateral ametropia, adjusting for confounders. Of 1511 subjects screened, 200 underwent ophthalmological assessment, including 65, 69, 35, and 16 in G1 to 4. History of eye worm passage in the previous year was reported by 121 participants (65.4%). Unilateral ametropia was more prevalent in people with history of eye worm passage in the previous year (26.5% versus 10.9%, p = 0.014). Chorioretinitis was the most frequent posterior segment lesion (n = 11, 6.1%) and was most prevalent in G3 (14.3%). The frequency of chorioretinitis was higher in participants with moderate-to-severe visual impairment (27.3% versus 4.4%, p = 0.002). High Loa MFL was an independent predictor of chorioretinitis (adjusted OR=5.28; p = 0.01). History of eye worm passage in the previous year was independently associated with unilateral ametropia (adjusted OR=3.27, p = 0.0088). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study has, for the first time, provided evidence of independent association between history of eye worm passage and unilateral ametropia, and between high Loa MFL and severe chorioretinal lesions. This suggests that loiasis should be classified as a neglected tropical disease.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
A cross-sectional investigation of the ophthalmological impact of loiasis in Cameroon, Central Africa
Date Crossref
26/06/2025
Éditeur
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentMollusks and Parasites StudiesParasites and Host Interactions

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.