Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

GeminiOne transcatheter edge-to-edge repair: comparative hemodynamic and biomechanical evaluation

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
6Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : cn, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is frequently used to treat mitral regurgitation (MR) patients. Despite its widely reported efficacy, complications such as single-leaflet device attachment (SLDA) and loss of leaflet insertion (LLI) can lead to recurrent MR, which compromises the clinical outcomes. Objectives This study compares the acute MR reduction and leaflet anchoring stability of a novel TEER device, GeminiOne (GEM), and MitraClip (MC). Methods In this study, ex vivo benchtop degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) and functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) models were used to evaluate the acute effectiveness of MR reduction by MitraClip XTW and GeminiOne 0626 in a BDC pulsatile flow duplicator. Furthermore, a benchtop study was performed to compare leaflet anchoring stability between XTW and GEM0626, in an attempt to investigate the likelihood of post-procedure leaflet detachment. Results The results of the pulsatile flow evaluation from the DMR and FMR model demonstrate that both TEER devices effectively reduced the regurgitant fraction (DMR vs. GEM0626 vs. XTW, 59.21 ± 10.29% vs. 35.73 ± 6.62% vs. 43.50 ± 8.89%; FMR vs. GEM0626 vs. XTW, 56.99 ± 8.74% vs. 27.99 ± 11.30% vs. 28.13 ± 10.64%). However, in the leaflet stability study which compared the various TEER devices under full grasp and partial grasp conditions, the detachment force of the anchored leaflet for GeminiOne is significantly higher than that of MitraClip, especially for the partial grasp (full grasp detachment force: 7.89 ± 2.42 vs. 6.36 ± 0.96 N, p = 0.1214; partial grasp detachment force: 6.03 ± 2.05 vs. 2.97 ± 0.76 N, p = 0.0021). Conclusion In the ex vivo pulsatile experiments, both GEM0626 and XTW are effective in terms of acute reduction of MR caused by DMR and FMR. However, in an anchored leaflet stability study, under partial grasp conditions, GEM0626 demonstrated a significantly higher leaflet detachment force. The better anchored stability of GeminiOne TEER may have long-term clinical benefits for MR treatment.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
GeminiOne transcatheter edge-to-edge repair: comparative hemodynamic and biomechanical evaluation
Date Crossref
25/06/2025
Éditeur
Frontiers Media SA
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsAortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesCardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.