High-sensitivity C-reactive protein mediates age-related vascular dysfunction: the Rotterdam study
Résumé fourni par la source
AIMS: To investigate the role of chronic low-grade systemic inflammation-specifically high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)-in mediating the relationship between ageing and vascular dysfunction, and to assess its causal contribution relative to lipid metabolism. We also examined sex-specific mediation to evaluate differences in inflammatory pathways between men and women. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed data from the Rotterdam Study, including 7591 participants with longitudinal carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and 6488 with cross-sectional pulse wave velocity (PWV) data. Mediation analysis assessed the roles of hsCRP, total cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein in the age-vascular dysfunction association accompanied by sex-stratification. Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) was conducted to explore the potential causal effects of hsCRP on vascular outcomes. hsCRP significantly mediated the effect of age on cIMT (2.66%, P = 0.001) and PWV (2.56%, P = 4.95 × 10-9), with mediation magnitudes comparable to those of lipid markers and stronger in men compared to women. MR analyses provided genetic support for a potential causal relationship between hsCRP and PWV, but not cIMT. CONCLUSION: Systemic inflammation indexed by hsCRP appears to mediate and potentially contribute causally to age-related vascular stiffness, particularly in men. These findings support the role of inflammation in functional vascular ageing and suggest that anti-inflammatory strategies may complement lipid-lowering approaches in reducing cardiovascular risk.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- High-sensitivity C-reactive protein mediates age-related vascular dysfunction: the Rotterdam study
- Date Crossref
- 25/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.