Richter transformation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia receiving ibrutinib: risk factors and outcomes
Rattachement africain : it, ch. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This study aimed to define the incidence and risk factors for diffuse large B cell lymphoma variant of RT (DLBCL-RT) in 976 patients with CLL who received ibrutinib therapy. DLBCL-RT was recorded in 83 (8.5%) patients, with a 7-year 15.6% rate. Most patients exhibited clinical signs of aggressive lymphoma, enlarged lymph nodes in 83%, cytopenia in 60%, and Suv max values ≥ 5 at CT/PET in 98%. Among patients for whom the data was available, 83% had unmutated IGHV, 60% TP 53 disruption, 26% mutated NOTCH1 , 10% were categorized in subset #8 and 82% had a clonally-related lymphoma. Response to chemoimmunotherapy was achieved by 32% of patients. Median OS was 4.7 months, with cytopenia at DLBCL-RT diagnosis being the only significant factor for inferior survival (HR, 1.68). In multivariable analysis, factors predictive for increased risk of DLBCL-RT were age <70 years (HR: 1.98, p = 0.019), TP 53 disruption (HR: 1.72, p = 0.044), with a trend to significance for prior treatment (HR: 1.91, p = 0.065). According to the number of these risk factors, DLBCL-RT rate varied from 4% to 22.6% ( p < 0.0001). In conclusion, patients with CLL receiving ibrutinib with age <70 years, TP 53 disruption and previously treated are at increased risk for developing DLBCL-RT and deserve close monitoring.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Richter transformation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia receiving ibrutinib: risk factors and outcomes
- Date Crossref
- 25/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.