The Genetic Puzzle of the Stress-Induced Cardiomyopathy (Takotsubo Syndrome): State of Art and Future Perspectives
Résumé fourni par la source
Takotsubo syndrome (TS), also known as stress-induced cardiomyopathy, is classically characterized by an acute onset mimicking myocardial infarction and by distinctive transient wall motion abnormalities detectable via echocardiography, often resembling a Japanese octopus trap (the so-called "takotsubo"). The possibility that a genetic background may contribute to TS susceptibility emerged early, supported by several familial case reports. Despite a large number of investigations, no definitive genetic markers associated with TS risk have been conclusively identified. The lack of a clear Mendelian inheritance pattern suggests a multifactorial etiology and pathogenesis, likely involving complex gene-environment interactions and a polygenic background. This review analyzes the genetic variants implicated in the different functional pathways contributing to TS pathogenesis and discusses the current state of knowledge regarding its genetic underpinnings. Finally, we propose future directions for research aimed at identifying a multigene susceptibility panel that could be useful in diagnosis, prevention strategies, and the identification of novel therapeutic targets for individuals at high risk. We conclude that innovative approaches based on data-mining algorithms and nonlinear analytic methods applied to large patient datasets may be instrumental in resolving the genetic complexity of TS.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The Genetic Puzzle of the Stress-Induced Cardiomyopathy (Takotsubo Syndrome): State of Art and Future Perspectives
- Date Crossref
- 24/06/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.