Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Patient-reported long-term outcomes after mastectomy, comparing the quilt technique to the conventional method

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
8Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: The quilt technique results in a significant reduction of postoperative complications after mastectomy. However, concerns remain about the long-term effects on cosmetics, pain, and shoulder function after the quilt technique. This study evaluated long-term patient-reported cosmetic outcomes after mastectomy, comparing the quilt and conventional techniques. METHODS: This retrospective multicentre evaluation study included 156 patients who underwent mastectomy between October 2018 and October 2022. Patients received quilting sutures (n = 81) or conventional closure (n = 75). The primary outcome was patient-reported cosmetic outcome, assessed using a 4-point Likert scale. Secondary outcomes were cosmetics evaluated by an expert panel, long-term shoulder function, and surgery-related pain. RESULTS: In the study cohort, the median age was 65 ± 18 years. Unilateral mastectomy was performed in 131 (84.0 %) patients and bilateral mastectomy in 25 (16.0 %) patients. The median time after surgery was 38 ± 23 months. Long-term cosmetic outcomes were not significantly different between the quilted and non-quilted cohorts (p = 0.114): in the quilted cohort, 7.5 % of patients rated their cosmetic outcome as poor, 27.5 % as fair, 41.3 % as good, and 23.8 % as excellent, compared to the non-quilted cohort, 20.6 % rated their outcome as poor, 23.5 % as fair, 39.7 % as good, and 16.2 % as excellent. Expert panel assessment, long-term shoulder function, and surgery-related pain were comparable between the cohorts. CONCLUSION: The quilt technique has no long-term deleterious effects regarding cosmetics, shoulder function, and surgery-related pain and can thus be applied safely in mastectomy wound closure. Concerns about long-term safety should be no argument for refraining from quilting.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Patient-reported long-term outcomes after mastectomy, comparing the quilt technique to the conventional method
Date Crossref
01/08/2025
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Breast Implant and ReconstructionReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular TechniquesWound Healing and Treatments

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.