Hemorheology in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Case–Control Study
Rattachement africain : hu. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Venous thromboembolism is more prevalent among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study aimed to identify prothrombotic hemorheological alterations in IBD. Methods: We conducted a case–control study with patients with ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease, and non-IBD control subjects. We measured hemorheological indicators including plasma viscosity (PV), whole blood viscosity (WBV), erythrocyte aggregation (EA), and erythrocyte deformability (ED). Uni- and multivariate tests were employed for analysis. Results: A total of 53 IBD patients and 77 control subjects were recruited. IBD patients showed significantly higher aggregation index (68.8% (35.3–83.5%) vs. 66.9% (35.2–83.5%), p = 0.003) and threshold shear rate (120 1/s (55–325 1/s) vs. 110 1/s (55–325 1/s), p < 0.001), with lower aggregation half-time (1.6 s (0.6–7.1 s) vs. 1.8 s (0.6–7.1 s), p = 0.004), indicating enhanced EA. However, after adjusting for covariates, including inflammatory markers, IBD no longer predicted EA. There were no significant differences in EA. PV, WBV, and ED between the groups. Fibrinogen, rather than the Crohn’s Disease Activity Index, was the strongest predictor of the outcomes. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that IBD patients exhibit enhanced EA, predicted mainly by fibrinogen. These results confirm that inflammation plays the cardinal role in the increased tendency for venous thromboembolism in IBD.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Hemorheology in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Case–Control Study
- Date Crossref
- 22/06/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.