Is there a place for ultrasound in diagnosing sarcopenia?
Rattachement africain : si. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is a progressive and generalised skeletal muscle disorder which presents as loss of muscle mass and function and is associated with increased likelihood of adverse outcomes, reduced quality of life and increased mortality. In developed countries, the prevalence of sarcopenia is rising due to increasing life expectancy. Still, in many clinical settings, sarcopenia may be overlooked and undertreated. While several tools are available for assessment of muscle mass and quality, there remains a need for safe, reliable and accurate diagnostic methods which can be implemented for both sarcopenia diagnosis and the evaluation of treatment efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound is an accessible and non-ionizing imaging technique that can potentially be used for that purpose. Several ultrasound parameters have been identified for their utility to provide assessment of muscle mass, quality and/or muscle function. Ultrasound is gaining recognition as an accurate and reproducible method of muscle mass assessment. However, there are still several limitations that preclude the application of ultrasound in routine clinical practice. Implementing a harmonized measurement protocol and conducting large-scale longitudinal studies on both healthy individuals and various patient cohorts could enable the establishment of clearly defined reference values for individual ultrasound parameters and, in turn, potentially reliable differentiation between normal and sarcopenic states.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Is there a place for ultrasound in diagnosing sarcopenia?
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.