Effects of Soil Moisture Heterogeneity on Temperature‐Humidity Dissimilarity in the Convective Boundary Layer
Rattachement africain : cn, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Surface moisture heterogeneity degrades temperature‐humidity (‐) similarity in the atmospheric surface layer, yet the underlying physical mechanisms driving this dissimilarity remain underexplored. This study employs large‐eddy simulations coupled with a land‐surface model to investigate ‐ similarity in the convective boundary layer (CBL) over surfaces with varying scales of surface moisture heterogeneity. Results reveal that as the heterogeneity scale increases, patch‐scale thermally induced circulations develop and interact with cellular turbulent organized structures, significantly altering scalar transport and turbulence dynamics. The patch‐scale thermally induced circulations enhance horizontal advection, modify the production and transport of scalar variances, and lead to a disproportionate increase in the standard deviations of temperature () and humidity (), accompanied by a reduction in ‐ covariance (). As a result, ‐ similarity is substantially reduced throughout the CBL. Spectral analysis reveals that ‐ dissimilarity is most strongly influenced by turbulent motions at scales corresponding to patch lengths. The findings offer insights into the role of surface heterogeneity in shaping scalar similarity in the CBL, with implications for land‐atmosphere interactions and parameterization in numerical models.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Effects of Soil Moisture Heterogeneity on Temperature‐Humidity Dissimilarity in the Convective Boundary Layer
- Date Crossref
- 21/06/2025
- Éditeur
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.