A Study on Knowledge-Based Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Methods for Power Information Operation and Maintenance
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The operation and maintenance (O&M) of power information systems have become increasingly complex due to the integration of diverse technologies. This paper explores the application of Knowledge-Based Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning methods to improve O&M processes. While In-Context Learning (ICL) and CoT prompting techniques enhance reasoning performance in large language models (LLMs), hallucinations—where models generate outputs that contradict commonsense or facts—remain a challenge, often due to insufficient background knowledge. Pretraining or fine-tuning with knowledge graphs can mitigate this, but such methods are impractical for closed-source models like ChatGPT or GPT-4. To address this, we focus on improving inference by integrating external knowledge during reasoning. Preliminary experiments show that contextual entity knowledge and prior knowledge from pretraining data are key factors. Based on these findings, we propose a knowledge-augmented prompting method that incorporates a knowledge-driven CoT reasoning framework, enhancing the generation of structured reasoning paths. Our evaluation of fidelity and factual consistency demonstrates that this approach significantly improves the reliability and scalability of traditional O&M methods.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A Study on Knowledge-Based Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Methods for Power Information Operation and Maintenance
- Date Crossref
- 09/05/2025
- Éditeur
- IEEE
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.