MiTo: tracing the phenotypic evolution of somatic cell lineages via mitochondrial single-cell multi-omics
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Mitochondrial single-cell lineage tracing (MT-scLT) has recently emerged as a scalable and non-invasive tool to trace somatic cell lineages. However, the reliability and resolution of MT-scLT remains highly debated. Here, we present MiTo , the first end-to-end framework for robust MT-scLT data analysis. Thanks to highly-optimized algorithms and user-friendly interfaces, this modular toolkit offers unprecedented control across the entire MT-scLT workflow. Benchmarked against novel real-world datasets (375–2,757 cells; 8–216 lentiviral clones), MiTo outperformed state-of-the-art methods and baselines in MT-scLT data pre-processing and clonal inference. Applied to a time-resolved dataset of breast cancer evolution (>2,500 cells), MiTo accurately inferred ground-truth cell lineages (ARI=0.94) and cell state transitions, detected clonal fitness markers, and quantified heritability of gene regulatory networks. Comparing alternative lineage markers, MiTo quantified the resolution limit of existing MT-scLT systems, which currently enable reliable inference of coarse-grained cellular ancestries, but not high-resolution phylogenetic inference. In conclusion, this work provides robust tools and practical guidelines to dissect somatic evolution with single-cell multi-omics.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- MiTo: tracing the phenotypic evolution of somatic cell lineages via mitochondrial single-cell multi-omics
- Date Crossref
- 25/05/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.