Prognostic Value of NT-ProBNP in Patients with Primary Mitral Regurgitation Undergoing Transcatheter Edge-To-Edge Repair

Le résumé fourni par la source

AIMS: The prognostic value of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients undergoing mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) for primary mitral regurgitation (PMR) is unclear. This study assessed the association between NT-proBNP and outcomes and explored its additive value to the Mitral Regurgitation International Database (MIDA) score. METHODS AND RESULTS: PRIME-MR, a retrospective, international, multicentre registry, includes 3083 consecutive PMR patients treated with M-TEER. This analysis focused on 1382 patients (median age 81 years, 47% female, 82% New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class III/IV, median EuroSCORE II 4.1%) with available NT-proBNP levels and follow-up. The primary endpoint was death or heart failure hospitalization within 3 years. Median NT-proBNP level was 1991 pg/ml (T1: 578, T3: 6285), and 384 patients reached the primary endpoint (Kaplan-Meier estimate: 48.5%). Log-transformed NT-proBNP levels independently predicted the primary endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.28; p < 0.001) after adjusting for NYHA class, haemoglobin, creatinine, and atrial fibrillation. In 1041 patients with a modified MIDA score (median 9), the score was initially associated with the primary endpoint (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.17; p = 0.002), but lost significance when adjusting for NT-proBNP levels, which remained independently predictive (adjusted HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.07-1.34; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: NT-proBNP, but not the MIDA score, was independently associated with death or heart failure hospitalizations within 3 years in M-TEER-treated PMR patients. Incorporating NT-proBNP levels into clinical assessment may improve risk stratification and potentially supports earlier intervention at lower NT-proBNP levels to optimize outcomes.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.