Prevalence and risk factor of Mycobacterium tuberculosis among patients attending in upazilla health complex on GeneXpert method at Banskhali Chittagong Bangladesh
Rattachement africain : bd. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Tuberculosis remains a major contributor to illness and death globally. This research was undertaken to assess the prevalence, and associated risk factors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in individuals suspected of having tuberculosis. A mixed method study design was applied to evaluate the risk factors and prevalence was detected through laboratory testing using the GeneXpert diagnostic method between December 2024 and March 2025. A total of 30 presumptive TB patients were included for quantitative data by face to face interview and 5 service providers and 4 tuberculosis infected patients for qualitative data using indeepth interview. The GeneXpert MTB assay was used to detect the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Among participants, 50% tested positive for tuberculosis. The average prevalence of tuberculosis infection during the study period was 15% approximately. 33.33% was observed in patients aged over 60 years and above. Risk factor analysis indicated significant associations with smoking (40%) and diabetes (36.67%). The study highlights a notable prevalence of tuberculosis and associated risk factors in the Banskhali region of Chittagong district Bangladesh.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prevalence and risk factor of Mycobacterium tuberculosis among patients attending in upazilla health complex on GeneXpert method at Banskhali Chittagong Bangladesh
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Comprehensive Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.