Non-Destructive Integrity Assessment of Austenitic Stainless-Steel Membranes via Magnetic Property Measurements
Rattachement africain : kr, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This study proposes a novel non-destructive methodology for assessing structural integrity in liquefied natural gas (LNG) carrier cargo containment systems (CCSs), addressing limitations of conventional inspection techniques like visual inspection and vacuum box testing. The method leverages strain-induced martensitic transformation (SIMT) in austenitic stainless steel (SUS304L), widely used in CCS membranes, quantifying magnetic permeability increase via a Feritscope to evaluate deformation history and damage. To analyze SUS304L SIMT behavior, uniaxial tensile (UT) and equi-biaxial tensile (EBT) tests were conducted, as these stress states predominate in CCS membranes. Microstructural evolution was examined using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), allowing a quantitative assessment of the transformed martensite volume fraction versus plastic strain. Subsequently, Feritscope measurements under the same conditions were calibrated against the XRD-measured martensite volume fraction for accuracy. Based on testing, this study introduces three complementary Feritscope approaches for evaluating CCS health: outlier detection, quantitative damaged area analysis, and time-series analysis. The methodology integrates data-driven quantitative assessment with conventional qualitative inspection, enhancing safety and maintenance efficiency.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Non-Destructive Integrity Assessment of Austenitic Stainless-Steel Membranes via Magnetic Property Measurements
- Date Crossref
- 19/06/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.