Accessibility and use of image-guided navigation systems for endoscopic sinus surgery in the UK: a cross-sectional, survey-based study of UK ENT consultants
Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: The American Academy of Otolaryngology endorses using image-guided navigation systems in appropriately selected sinus and skull base cases. This study aimed to understand current practices, accessibility and use of image-guided navigation systems in otolaryngology departments across the UK. METHODS: A 13-point survey was distributed to UK otolaryngology consultants, with responses collated between May and December 2023. RESULTS: A total of 154 responses were received. Whilst 28.6 per cent felt it should be mandatory for a department undertaking endoscopic sinus surgery to have image-guided navigation systems, 33.1 per cent reported a lack of access, with financial cost the primary barrier. Half of the respondents reported using image-guided navigation systems for surgery involving the sphenoid sinus and "full-house" functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Over three-quarters felt image-guided navigation systems should be utilised for frontal sinus pathology or expanded approaches. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights variations in access to image-guided navigation systems and a range of practices regarding its use for endoscopic sinus surgery amongst UK otolaryngologists.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Accessibility and use of image-guided navigation systems for endoscopic sinus surgery in the UK: a cross-sectional, survey-based study of UK ENT consultants
- Date Crossref
- 18/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.