Acute Abdomen: Differential Diagnosis and Surgical Approach - A Brief Review
Résumé fourni par la source
Acute abdomen is one of the most frequent and challenging medical and surgical emergencies, accounting for up to 10% of emergency-department visits and for substantial morbidity and mortality when diagnosis and intervention are delayed. It is characterised by sudden-onset or progressively worsening abdominal pain, often accompanied by systemic signs such as fever, tachycardia or hypotension, and may evolve to sepsis and shock. The most common aetiologies include inflammatory processes notably appendicitis and cholecystitis, obstructive, perforative and vascular causes. Clinical reasoning must integrate detailed anamnesis, thorough physical examination and complementary tests. Among the latter, Computed Tomography (CT) is the gold standard for clarifying complex situations, whereas ultrasonography remains important for pregnant women, children and populations in whom radiation exposure should be minimised. In the therapeutic setting, the advent of laparoscopic surgery marked a turning point by enabling less operative trauma, fewer complications and faster functional recovery, although laparotomy remains indispensable in diffuse peritonitis or haemodynamic instability. Structured care protocols and a multidisciplinary approach have proved essential to reduce variability in management and optimise resources. The combination of experienced clinical assessment, high-performance diagnostic methods and individualised surgical techniques is therefore central to better outcomes and patient safety.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Acute Abdomen: Differential Diagnosis and Surgical Approach - A Brief Review
- Date Crossref
- 15/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Respub Journals
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.