A framework to assess risks for non-medical use of psychedelics: The liability for abuse of psychedelics questionnaire (LAPQ)
Rattachement africain : ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
: As psychedelic research moves forward, trial design could benefit from assessments of potential risks of treatment. One such risk is future abuse or misuse of the drug or other drugs of abuse. Like the ketamine literature, psychedelic studies to date have not included measures designed to thoroughly address this risk. With aims to fill this gap, we previously developed a ketamine/esketamine drug liking and craving questionnaire (DLCQ), which primarily considered level of drug liking as a risk factor for potential future misuse or abuse. In adapting this for use with psychedelics, several considerations arose, including the likelihood that the psychedelic experience may be more universally pleasurable, and that desire to use psychedelics again may carry several underlying reasons. Here, we describe the Liability for Abuse of Psychedelics Questionnaire (LAPQ), which provides a framework incorporating 3 domains; substance use history, liking and craving for the drug in question, and subsequent changes in substance use patterns after exposure to the drug. While not a validated instrument, we propose this framework may be used in conjunction with other side effect tracking tools to more comprehensively address risks in psychedelic studies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A framework to assess risks for non-medical use of psychedelics: The liability for abuse of psychedelics questionnaire (LAPQ)
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.