Floristic Diversity of Community Forests in Togo’s Maritime Region
Résumé fourni par la source
In the context of increasing land-use change, tropical forests are increasingly subjected to anthropogenic pressure, which is impacting their floristic composition. This study was conducted in community forests in the Maritime Region of Togo to assess their floristic diversity. Data were collected from 92 vegetation plots (30 m × 30 m each), arranged along linear transects following an altitudinal gradient. In each plot, ecological variables (e.g., location, geographic coordinates, vegetation type, canopy cover, and management practices) and floristic data (i.e., all plant species present) were recorded. Floristic and ecological data were analyzed using diversity indices (Shannon, Simpson) and spectrum analyses (biological and phytogeographic types). A total of 211 plant species were recorded, belonging to 175 genera and 65 families. The Fabaceae family was the most represented with 44 species (21%), followed by Euphorbiaceae (12 species, 6%) and Poaceae (9 species, 4%). The biological spectrum was dominated by mesophanerophytes and nanophanerophytes. In terms of phytogeographic distribution, GC-SZ and GC types were the most prevalent. The floristic composition and diversity of these community forests appear to be significantly influenced by various anthropogenic pressures, particularly agricultural expansion, urban encroachment, and illegal harvesting. The findings provide valuable insights for developing sustainable forest management strategies and guiding conservation planning and research in the Maritime Region.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Floristic Diversity of Community Forests in Togo’s Maritime Region
- Date Crossref
- 17/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Stecab Publishing
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.