Phenotype-Driven Variability in Longitudinal Body Composition Changes After a Very Low-Calorie Ketogenic Intervention: A Machine Learning Cluster Approach

Résumé fourni par la source

Background: Obesity is a major global public health issue with no fully satisfactory solutions. Most nutritional interventions rely on caloric restriction, with varying degrees of success. Very low-calorie ketogenic diets (VLCKD) have demonstrated rapid and sustained weight loss by inducing ketone bodies through lipolysis, reducing appetite, and preserving lean mass while maintaining metabolic health. Methods: A prospective clinical study analyzed sociodemographic, anthropometric, and adherence data from 7775 patients undergoing a multidisciplinary nutritional single-arm intervention based on a commercial weight-loss program. This method, using protein preparations with a specific balanced nutritional profile, aimed to identify key predictors of weight-loss success and classify population phenotypes with shared baseline characteristics and weight-loss patterns to optimize treatment personalization. Results: Statistical and machine learning analyses revealed that male gender (−9.2 kg vs. −5.9 kg) and higher initial body weight (−8.9 kg vs. −4.0 kg) strongly predict greater weight loss on a VLCKD, while age has a lesser impact. Two distinct population clusters emerged, differing in age, sex, follow-up duration, and medical visits, demonstrating unique weight-loss success patterns. These clusters help define individualized strategies for optimizing outcomes. Conclusions: These findings translationally support associations with the efficacy of a multidisciplinary VLCK weight-loss program and highlight predictors of success. Recognizing variables such as sex, age, and initial weight enhances the potential for a precision-based approach in obesity management, enabling more tailored and effective treatments for diverse patient profiles and prescribe weight loss personalized recommendations.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.