A Neural Network-Enhanced Digital Background Calibration Algorithm for Residue Amplifier Nonlinearity in Pipelined ADCs
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This paper proposes a neural network-enhanced digital background calibration scheme for calibrating the linear and the third-order nonlinear gain errors of the residue amplifier (RA) in pipelined ADCs. A customized convolutional neural network (CNN) is designed to extract the information of the linear and the third-order nonlinear gain errors of RA with dither injection. Compared to traditional correlation-based calibration algorithms, the proposed method can significantly improve convergence speed and robustness against dither capacitor mismatch. Compared with previous neural networkbased calibration techniques which are commonly used for foreground calibration, the proposed method can operate in background to follow error variations without any risk of signal fidelity problems. Off-chip validation with a silicon-proven 14-bit 1.3 GS/s pipelined ADC shows that, after calibration, the SNDR and SFDR are improved from 46.6 dB and 55.2 dB to 63.1 dB and 80.4 dB, respectively. Moreover, the proposed method takes only 75K samples to reach convergence, whereas traditional algorithms require several to hundreds of millions of samples to achieve convergence (102 104 times faster). The implementation result shows that the power consumption of the proposed calibrator is 34.8 mW at 1.3 GHz clock frequency.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A Neural Network-Enhanced Digital Background Calibration Algorithm for Residue Amplifier Nonlinearity in Pipelined ADCs
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.