Nine years’ experience of an educational programme for patients treated with oral anticoagulants in a cardiology department
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: Oral anticoagulants present significant risks of iatrogenic complications. An educational programme dedicated to patients treated with vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was set up in our cardiology department in 2013. The aim of this study is to describe and assess our programme's effectiveness, through evaluation of patients' skills and adherence, and to identify associated factors. METHODS: tests for comparison of variables and univariate linear regression analysis for identification of variability factors. A value of p<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Since 2013, 934 patients were educated, representing 14.7% of patients with oral anticoagulants in cardiology units. Mean±SD age was 68.7±16.4 years and the proportion of men was 58.9%. After hospital discharge, skills were assessed for 334 patients: mean score was 0.80±0.17 (minimum 0.1 to maximum 1). Younger patients presented higher scores than older ones (p<0.001). Adherence was assessed for 331 patients: levels were high, medium and low for 58%, 31.4% and 10.6% of them, respectively. Women presented higher adherence than men (p=0.01). Neither oral anticoagulant type (VKA or DOAC) nor characteristics of educational sessions presented significant association with skills or adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Our programme educated a large number of patients and seems to fit with VKAs and DOACs. Improvement areas could be to increase patient assessment and to reinforce education of elderly patients.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Nine years’ experience of an educational programme for patients treated with oral anticoagulants in a cardiology department
- Date Crossref
- 15/06/2025
- Éditeur
- BMJ
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.