VIDAS® TB-IGRA assay for diagnosing tuberculosis infection in people living with HIV: A preliminary study
Rattachement africain : Afrique du Sud, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of presumed latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (LTBI) is problematic in people living with HIV (PLWH) because of sub-optimal sensitivity and high indeterminate rates, especially in those with advanced immunosuppression. Better diagnostic tools for LTBI are needed in this sub-population. METHODS: We compared the sensitivity of VIDAS TB-IGRA, a fully automated RD1-specific new interferon-ϒ-release assay (IGRA), to QFT-Plus in 77 PLWH with active pulmonary TB who had varying CD4 counts. Sputum culture positivity served as the reference standard for active TB. RESULTS: , [88.9% (40/45) vs 88.6% (39/44)], and in those with CD4 <100 [85.7% (18/21) vs 80.0% (16/20)]. However, VIDAS TB-IGRA had a higher sensitivity in those with CD4 <50 [92.3% (12/13) vs 75% (9/12)] and fewer indeterminate results overall [0 vs 2]. When the indeterminate results in this subgroup were regarded as negative, the comparative sensitivity was [92.3% (12/13) vs 69.2% (9/13)]. CONCLUSION: VIDAS TB-IGRA had a similar sensitivity to QFT-Plus in PLWH. Whether VIDAS TB-IGRA sensitivity is significantly better at lower CD4 counts remains to be confirmed in a larger study. These data have implications for the diagnosis of LTBI in those with advanced immunosuppression.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- VIDAS® TB-IGRA assay for diagnosing tuberculosis infection in people living with HIV: A preliminary study
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.