Role of Artificial Intelligence in Human Resource

Le résumé fourni par la source

The rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have impacted various industries, including human resources (HR). This thesis aims to explore the role of AI in HR and its potential implications on organizations and employees. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify the various applications of AI in HR, such as recruitment, employee engagement, performance management, and training and development. The study also analyzed the potential benefits and risks associated with the integration of AI in HR, including issues related to bias, privacy, and job displacement. The findings of this study suggest that AI can enhance HR practices by improving efficiency, accuracy, and objectivity. However, the risks associated with AI adoption must be carefully considered and managed to ensure ethical and responsible use. This study provides insights into the current state of AI in HR and its future potential, offering recommendations for organizations and policymakers to maximize the benefits and minimize the risks of AI integration in the HR function. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in human resources (HR) has become increasingly popular in recent years. AI has the potential to transform HR practices by enabling organizations to automate routine tasks, make more data-driven decisions, and improve the employee experience. However, the use of AI in HR also raises important ethical and legal considerations, such as algorithmic bias and data privacy. This thesis aims to explore the role of AI in HR and its impact on various HR functions, including recruitment and selection, employee engagement, performance management, and training and development. The study also examines the potential risks and challenges of using AI in HR and identifies strategies to mitigate these risks. The research methodology employed in this study is a mixed-methods approach, combining both qualitative and quantitative research methods. The qualitative component involves a literature review and case studies of organizations that have implemented AI in HR. The quantitative component involves a survey of HR professionals to understand their perceptions of AI in HR and their readiness to adopt AI in their organizations. The findings of this study reveal that AI has significant potential to improve HR practices, particularly in recruitment and selection, where it can reduce bias and improve the accuracy and efficiency of the hiring process. AI can also improve employee engagement by providing personalized experiences and feedback, and enhance performance management by enabling real-time monitoring and feedback. In training and development, AI can provide personalized learning experiences that meet the unique needs and preferences of individual employees. However, the study also reveals that the use of AI in HR raises important ethical and legal considerations that must be addressed. Algorithmic bias, data privacy, and the potential for job displacement are some of the key risks and challenges associated with the use of AI in HR. To mitigate these risks, organizations must adopt a proactive approach that involves regular monitoring and evaluation of AI systems, transparency in decision-making processes, and ongoing training and development for HR professionals. The study also identifies several critical success factors for the successful implementation of AI in HR, including strong leadership support, a clear understanding of business objectives, collaboration between HR and IT professionals, and a focus on employee engagement and well- being. Overall, this thesis contributes to the growing body of knowledge on the role of AI in HR and its implications for organizations and HR professionals. By identifying the potential benefits, risks, and challenges of using AI in HR, and providing strategies to mitigate these risks, this study aims to inform organizational decision-making and help HR professionals prepare for the future of work..

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.