An intelligent intrusion detection system for cyber-physical systems using GAN-LSTM networks
Résumé fourni par la source
Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) face increasing cybersecurity threats, demanding advanced intrusion detection methods. This research proposes a novel GAN-LSTM hybrid model to enhance anomaly detection in CPS by addressing key limitations of traditional approaches, including class imbalance and temporal dependency learning. The primary objectives are: (i) developing an adversarial learning framework where the generator synthesizes realistic attack patterns while the discriminator improves detection robustness, (ii) introducing a hybrid anomaly scoring mechanism combining reconstruction and discrimination loss, and (iii) validating performance on real-world CPS datasets (SWaT and WADI). The model achieves 87% accuracy (SWaT) and 91% accuracy (WADI), with precision reaching 93% (SWaT) and 97% (WADI)—demonstrating strong capability to minimize false alarms. Notably, it attains 99% recall on SWaT, ensuring near-complete attack detection, though WADI recall remains lower (75%) due to complex attack patterns. The balanced F1-scores (91% SWaT, 82% WADI) outperform state-of-the-art methods like MAD-GAN by 14–45%. Key innovations include LSTM-based temporal feature learning and GAN-driven synthetic minority oversampling, effectively handling CPS-specific challenges such as multivariate time-series complexity and rare attack instances. These results highlight the model’s potential for real-world CPS security, while future work will address deployment constraints like computational latency.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- An intelligent intrusion detection system for cyber-physical systems using GAN-LSTM networks
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.