Incidence, Risk Factors and Effect on Outcomes of Microcystic Macular Edema After Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment
Rattachement africain : it, de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, risk factors and clinical significance of microcystic macular edema (MME) after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). DESIGN: Interventional case series. METHODS: Clinical charts of patients who underwent PPV for RRD were retrospectively reviewed. MME was diagnosed with optical coherence tomography in presence of small, nonconfluent elliptical cystoid spaces located at the level of the inner nuclear layer and sparing other retinal layers and the foveal center. The potential relationship between clinical and surgical variables and the occurrence of MME was evaluated with a multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 318 eyes which underwent PPV for RRD were included. In total, 35 eyes (11.0%) presented cystoid changes consistent with MME, while 93 (29.2%) showed "typical" cystoid macular edema. Silicone oil tamponade was significantly associated with the occurrence of MME (P = .010). Best-corrected visual acuity did not differ significantly between eyes with and without MME (0.44 ± 0.54 versus 0.71 ± 0.76 logMAR; P = .103). CONCLUSIONS: This study found an incidence of 11% of MME following vitrectomy for RRD. Although MME was significantly associated with silicone oil tamponade, it showed no relationship with postoperative visual outcomes. Thus, no anti-inflammatory treatment may be required.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Incidence, Risk Factors and Effect on Outcomes of Microcystic Macular Edema After Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment
- Date Crossref
- 01/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.