Modeling diurnal gross primary production in East Asia using Himawari-8/9 geostationary satellite data

Le résumé fourni par la source

Gross primary production (GPP) is a key indicator of plant growth and ecosystem health, and accurately capturing its diurnal variation is crucial for understanding vegetation responses to extreme heat and drought. However, the applicability of satellite-based semi-empirical models to diurnal GPP estimation remains limited. This study refined diurnal GPP estimation in humid temperate climates by leveraging Himawari-8/9 geostationary satellite data to incorporate direct/diffuse radiation and the nonlinear GPP response to diurnal variations in absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR). The eddy covariance-light use efficiency (EC-LUE) model was employed by adopting three approaches: the direct/diffuse (DD) setting to consider the direct/diffuse components of APAR, DD with nonlinear relationship (DD-NL) setting to additionally consider the nonlinear GPP-APAR relationship, and the baseline setting. The model was calibrated and validated using the eddy-covariance tower observations from 18 sites across Japan and South Korea. The DD-NL setting improved accuracy by correcting the baseline's overestimation of GPP under high APAR and underestimation under low APAR. Particularly for forest sites, the DD-NL setting reduced midday overestimations by 12–30 % on clear-sky days and morning/afternoon underestimations by 25–40 % on cloudy days. In the baseline setting, low-APAR biases progressively accumulated across daily to annual timescales, whereas the DD-NL setting reduced them to −0.10 g C m −2 day −1 and -51 g C m −2 year −1 (−2.7 % of the site's average GPP). The DD setting had minimal impact in densely vegetated sites. Our findings show that the DD-NL setting in LUE models enhances geostationary satellite-based GPP estimates across diurnal to annual timescales, supporting ecosystem monitoring during extreme events and long-term carbon assessments.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.