User Perceptions of Vocabulary Learning Features in Duolingo and Babbel: A Comparative Analysis of Effectiveness and User Satisfaction
Rattachement africain : pk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This study conducts a comparative analysis of two prominent mobile applications for language learning, Duolingo and Babbel, focusing on their vocabulary acquisition features through the lenses of Spaced Repetition Theory (SRT) and Cognitive Load Theory (CLT). Utilizing a content analysis methodology, user reviews from the Google Play Store were systematically coded and analyzed to identify key themes related to usability, user satisfaction, and learning effectiveness. The findings reveal that Duolingo excels in engaging users through gamification and interactive elements, fostering a playful learning environment that encourages consistent practice. However, its structure may lead to increased cognitive load due to a lack of clear guidance. Conversely, Babbel offers a more systematic and formal approach, emphasizing grammar and real-life context, which effectively reduces cognitive load and enhances vocabulary retention. Despite its strengths, Babbel's lack of gamified elements may limit user engagement. This research contributes to the understanding of Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL) by highlighting the strengths and limitations of each application, providing insights into future development in language learning technologies. The study underscores the importance of aligning application design with user preferences to optimize vocabulary learning outcomes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- User Perceptions of Vocabulary Learning Features in Duolingo and Babbel: A Comparative Analysis of Effectiveness and User Satisfaction
- Date Crossref
- 30/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Qlantic e Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
The Women University Multan Department of English pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Department of English — The Women University Multan.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.