Aller au contenu principal
2025 conference-abstract

Abstract P5-03-14: Efficacy and safety of inetetamab-containing regimens in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in first-line/second-line setting

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Inetetamab is a novel recombinant humanized anti-Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) monoclonal antibody. This real-world retrospective study assessed the efficacy and safety of inetetamab-containing regimens in first-line/second-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This study retrospectively recruited HER2-positive MBC patients who received inetetamab- containing regimens from June 2020 to May 2023. The outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). A total of 329 patients were enrolled and included in the efficacy analysis. The most frequently used treatment strategy was contained inetetamab plus pyrotinib (205/329, 62.3%). Of 329 patients for efficacy evaluation, the median PFS was 14.5 months. Patients treated with first-line regimens benefited the most, with a median PFS of 15.0 versus (vs.) 10.0 months (first-line- vs. second-line inetetamab plus pyrotinib, p <0.001), 19.0 vs. 17.0 months (first-line- vs. second-line inetetamab plus pertuzumab, p=0.096), and 14.0 vs. not reached months (first-line- vs. second-line inetetamab plus chemotherapy, p=0.229). The inetetamab plus pertuzumab group had the longest survival compared with inetetamab plus pyrotinib and inetetamab plus chemotherapy group in first-line (mPFS, 19.0 vs. 15.0 vs. 13.0 months) and second-line (mPFS, 17.0 vs. 10.0 vs. not reached months) settings. The ORR was 54.4% (95%CI, 49.0%-59.7%), with 14 (4.3%) complete response (CR) and 150 (45.6%) partial response (PR). Besides, 148 (45.0%) patients had stable disease (SD) for a disease control rate (DCR) of 99.4% (95%CI, 97.8%-99.8%). Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were observed in 29.5% of all 329 patients and mainly included diarrhea (38/329, 11.6%), white blood cell decreased (32/329, 9.7%), myelosuppression (18/329, 5.5%), neutrophil count decreased (7/329, 2.1%). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Compared with the other two subgroups, the incidence AEs of any grade (205/329, 62.3%) and grade ≥3 (80/329, 24.3%) in inetetamab plus pyrotinib group was the highest. Following the first- and second-line of treatment, inetetamab- containing combinations demonstrated promising clinical activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with HER2-positive MBC, especially in the first-line treatment. Citation Format: Yuxin Mu, Hui Zhang, Chao Deng, Jiao Yang, Lu Gan, Qingmo Yang, Xuefeng Xu, Wanping Liang, Xiaowei Qi, Liang Xu, Jian Zhang. Efficacy and safety of inetetamab-containing regimens in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in first-line/second-line setting [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2024; 2024 Dec 10-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(12 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-03-14.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Abstract P5-03-14: Efficacy and safety of inetetamab-containing regimens in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in first-line/second-line setting
Date Crossref
13/06/2025
Éditeur
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les sujets associés

Cancer Treatment and PharmacologyHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.