Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 review

Systematic Literature Review of Decision‐Analytic Modeling Studies on Nature‐Based Social Prescribing and Loneliness

1Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
16Institutions déclarées
7Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Nature‐based social prescribing (NBSP) is an evolving subject aiming to reduce loneliness and to foster social connections, health, and well‐being. To evaluate the short‐term and long‐term consequences of different health technologies, decision‐analytic modeling can be applied. Decision‐analytic modeling studies systematically integrate current short‐ and long‐term evidence to weigh benefits, harms, and costs of different strategies. Our systematic literature review identified and assessed decision‐analytic modeling studies addressing specifically NBSP or other interventions aiming to reduce loneliness. Predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria guided our systematic literature search in five databases. Title/abstract screening and full‐text screening were conducted by two independent reviewers. An a priori defined extraction table included country, intervention, and model type. The Philips framework was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. Overall, 3273 studies were identified, and 16 studies were eligible for full‐text screening. None of these studies applied a decision‐analytic model specifically to NBSP. However, two studies compared interventions for reducing loneliness. One study was conducted in Australia and performed a cost‐utility analysis, resulting in cost‐saving results and a positive return on investment. The second study was conducted in England and applied a cost‐effectiveness analysis resulting in 768 British pounds per loneliness‐free year gained. Overall, the evaluated interventions can be regarded as cost‐effective, and in some instances, they have the potential to save costs. Further research on the connection of loneliness, overall health, social well‐being, and quality of life and their integration into decision‐analytic studies is needed.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Systematic Literature Review of Decision‐Analytic Modeling Studies on Nature‐Based Social Prescribing and Loneliness
Date Crossref
01/01/2025
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Art Therapy and Mental HealthHealth, psychology, and well-beingHealth Policy Implementation Science

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.