KEY STAKEHOLDERS’ PERCEPTIONS REGARDING ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSING IN PAKISTAN
Rattachement africain : pk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Aim: To explore the perceptions of key stakeholders regarding advanced practice nursing in Pakistan. Methodology: A qualitative case study research design was employed to facilitate an in-depth exploration of perceptions within a defined context. With a sample size of 11 determined by data saturation, purposive sampling was utilized as a data collection technique. Face-to-face, in-depth individual interviews were conducted, recorded, and analyzed. The study spanned six months, receiving approval from the ethical review boards of the Khyber Medical University. Results: Five themes emerged those were: Stakeholders’ views regarding advanced practice nursing, anticipated challenges and issues in introducing APN in Pakistan, Potential benefits of advanced practice nursing, Required Qualification and competencies for APN, Strategies for commencement of Advanced practice nursing Conclusion: The study explores the significance of advanced practice nursing in addressing the healthcare needs of Pakistan's growing population. Recognizing it as a timely imperative, the findings highlight the need for nurses to elevate their knowledge and skills. Despite anticipated hurdles, the study concludes that advanced practice nursing holds the potential to enhance the overall healthcare system, emphasizing the importance of proactive measures to address challenges before initiation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- KEY STAKEHOLDERS’ PERCEPTIONS REGARDING ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSING IN PAKISTAN
- Date Crossref
- 13/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Insightful Education Research Institute
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.