Fluorescence Guided Surgery in Gastric Cancer: What Do We Have and What Can We Do?
Résumé fourni par la source
Background and Objective: Fluorescence imaging has emerged as a valuable adjunct in gastric surgery, enhancing resection precision and oncologic outcomes. However, the use of indocyanine green (ICG) remains controversial due to uncertainties in efficacy and administration. A lack of standardized protocols persists. This review summarizes current applications of fluorescence in gastric cancer surgery, outlining existing challenges and future research needs. Methods: A systematic PubMed search (2004-2024) was conducted using keywords such as "indocyanine green," "carbon particle," "blue dye," "gastric cancer," and "gastroesophageal junction cancer" to identify and review key uses of fluorescence agents in gastrointestinal malignancies. Key Findings: Fluorescence-guided imaging aids intraoperative tumor localization, shortens operative time, and enhances lymph node (LN) yield, improving staging accuracy. Its role in sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection is still under debate due to false negatives. ICG fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) may lower anastomotic leak rates, though strong supporting evidence is limited. No consensus exists regarding ICG dosage, timing, or delivery method. Conclusions: Current evidence supports the safety and efficacy of fluorescence imaging in gastrointestinal surgery, with promising outcomes in precision and staging. However, uniform protocols for fluorescence use are urgently needed. Future studies should aim to standardize administration and optimize clinical implementation to fully realize its benefits.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Fluorescence Guided Surgery in Gastric Cancer: What Do We Have and What Can We Do?
- Date Crossref
- 13/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.