Aller au contenu principal
2025 article

FDG-PET/CT and CT Compared for Evaluation of Tumor Response to First-Line Immunotherapy and Prediction of Prognosis in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapy-modified Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (imPERCIST) using FDG-PET/CT and immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST) using CT were compared for evaluation of response, prognosis prediction, and effect on patient management in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with first-line immunotherapy, or immunotherapy and chemotherapy combined. METHODS: Thirty-three patients (26 males, median 68.0 years old) with histologically NSCLC without EGFR/ALK/KRAS alterations underwent pembrolizumab treatment only or immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy. FDG-PET/CT and diagnostic CT scanning was performed at the baseline and after two to four cycles (2 in 8, 3 in 12, 4 in 13 patients). Findings for therapeutic response obtained with imPERCIST and irRECIST were compared. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined using log-rank and Cox methods. RESULTS: imPERCIST indicated that 10 patients had complete metabolic response (CMR), eight partial metabolic response (PMR), three stable metabolic disease (SMD), and 12 progressive metabolic disease (PMD), while irRECIST showed that two had complete response (CR), 14 PR, nine SD, and eight PD, indicating substantial concordance (κ = 0.615). Twenty-eight patients showed progression and 18 died from NSCLC after a median 16.2 months. Patients showing response based on imPERCIST and irRECIST (CMR/PMR, CR/PR, respectively) showed significantly longer PFS and OS than nonresponders (SMD/PMD, SD/PD, respectively) (imPERCIST: p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0001, respectively; irRECIST: p = 0.0018 and p = 0.011, respectively). imPERCIST resulted in a change of management in 12 of the 33 patients (36.3%) with an additional effect on patient management in 4 patients (12.1%) evaluated by irRECIST. CONCLUSION: For evaluation of NSCLC patients for tumor response and patient management following first-line immunotherapy or that combined with chemotherapy, and predicting prognosis, both FDG-PET/CT and CT findings are accurate, with FDG-PET/CT being superior.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
FDG-PET/CT and CT Compared for Evaluation of Tumor Response to First-Line Immunotherapy and Prediction of Prognosis in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Date Crossref
13/06/2025
Éditeur
S. Karger AG
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.