Clusters of post-acute COVID-19 symptoms: a latent class analysis across 9 databases and 7 countries
Rattachement africain : gb, es, ee, fr, nl, kr, us, no. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: Prior evidence has suggested the multisystem symptomatic manifestations of post-acute COVID-19 condition (PCC). Here we conducted a network cluster analysis of 24 World Health Organization-proposed symptoms to identify potential latent subclasses of PCC. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Individuals with a positive test of or diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 after September 2020 and with at least 1 symptom within ≥90 to 365 days following infection were included. Subanalyses were conducted among people with ≥3 different symptoms. Summary characteristics were provided for each cluster. All analyses were conducted separately in 9 databases from 7 countries, including data from primary care, hospitals, national health claims and national health registries, allowing to compare clusters across the different healthcare settings. RESULTS: This study included 787,078 persons with PCC. Single-symptom clusters were common across all databases, particularly for joint pain, anxiety, depression and allergy. Complex clusters included anxiety-depression and abdominal-gastrointestinal symptoms. CONCLUSION: Substantial heterogeneity within and between PCC clusters was seen across health-care settings. Current definitions of PCC should be critically reviewed to reflect this variety in clinical presentation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Clusters of post-acute COVID-19 symptoms: a latent class analysis across 9 databases and 7 countries
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.