Bacterial Pathogens and Antibiotic Resistance in Bloodstream Infections in Tunisia: A 13-Year Trend Analysis
Résumé fourni par la source
The antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance network has been monitoring bloodstream bacterial pathogens and their resistance since 1999 in Tunisia. We report the long-term trends in the distribution of bloodstream bacterial pathogens and their resistance patterns from this surveillance database. We analyzed antibiotic resistance rates in 11 tertiary teaching hospital laboratories under the AMR surveillance network during 2011–2023, focusing on six priority bacterial pathogens, using the Cochrane–Armitage test for trend analysis. Of 22,795 isolates, K. pneumoniae (38.5%) was the most common, followed by S. aureus (20.4%), E. coli (13.6%), and A. baumannii (10.3%). Carbapenem resistance was highest in A. baumannii (77%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (29.3%), K. pneumoniae (19.4%), and Enterobacter cloacae (6.8%). Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCREB) increased from 10.6% to 26.3% (p-value < 0.001), and from 39% to 50.2%, respectively, during 2011–2023 (p-value < 0.001). Vancomycin resistance (38.3%) and the emergence of linezolid resistance in 2019 (2.4%) were reported in E. faecium isolates. Resistance to carbapenems and 3GC is a major challenge to controlling BSI in Tunisia. The national AMR surveillance network helps monitor annual patterns and guides empirical therapy. An integrated database combining clinical profiles and resistance data via real-time data-sharing platforms could improve clinical decision-making.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Bacterial Pathogens and Antibiotic Resistance in Bloodstream Infections in Tunisia: A 13-Year Trend Analysis
- Date Crossref
- 12/06/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.