Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 review

Consequences of academic selection for post‐primary education in the United Kingdom: A systematic literature review

4Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Academic selection for post‐primary education is an important feature of the educational landscape in some parts of the United Kingdom, most notably in Northern Ireland and some areas of England, in addition to several other global contexts. This work systematically reviewed studies in a UK context which investigated the consequences of academic selection. The United Kingdom provided a suitable context for the review because both academic selection and all‐ability post‐primary education in comprehensive schools have featured, and continue to feature, in its education system, thus permitting a comparison of the relative merits of the two systems. Thirty‐two publications met the inclusion criteria and were included in the narrative review. Results of the review indicate that, when relevant student and school characteristics are controlled for, academic selection has a negligible overall effect on academic achievement relative to all‐ability comprehensive post‐primary education. The findings also indicate that there is negligible difference between the capacity of the two systems to promote intergenerational social mobility, but that academic selection potentially reinforces and further entrenches socioeconomic disparities in educational outcomes. Possible gaps in the evidence base are highlighted and implications for further research, policy and practice are elucidated. Context and implications Rationale for this study: This review was undertaken to create a robust, up‐to‐date synthesis of the evidence pertaining to the impact of academic selection in the United Kingdom. Why the new findings matter: The findings are important because of ongoing debates about the future role of academic selection within the educational landscape of the United Kingdom. Implications for policy makers and members of the public with an interest in education: The evidence reviewed suggests that there are benefits of a grammar school education for those who are fortunate enough to obtain one, particularly in relation to improved academic achievement and progression to higher education. However, it is also evident that there are some difficulties associated with academic selection in the UK context. The dominant issues of concern are the failure of academic selection to promote social mobility and the way in which it appears to reinforce and further entrench socioeconomic disparities in educational outcomes.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Consequences of academic selection for post‐primary education in the United Kingdom: A systematic literature review
Date Crossref
09/06/2025
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Education Systems and PolicyIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesSchool Choice and Performance

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.