Clinical Features of Children With MOG-IgG Who Fulfill Criteria of Multiple Sclerosis and Overlapping Disorders
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to report the clinical features, disease-modifying treatment (DMT) response, and outcomes of children with MOG-IgG who fulfill the 2017 McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: This prospective observational study included children (<18 years) with a suspected acquired demyelinating syndrome (ADS) whose serum or CSF was positive for MOG-IgG, who met the indicated MS criteria, and who had ≥1 year of clinical follow-up. MOG-IgG was tested using live cell-based assays. RESULTS: Of 554 children with confirmed ADS (196 with MOG-IgG), 8 (median age 11 years, interquartile range 9-14) harbored MOG-IgG and fulfilled MS criteria: 2 had typical MS and 6 had overlapping MOGAD-MS features at onset, but 5 of the latter group developed an MS-like course during follow-up. Five of 7 patients with assessable samples were Epstein-Barr virus seropositive at disease onset, and all 8 had persistent silent radiologic activity with lesional location and morphology suggestive of MS, leading to initiation of DMT. All initial treatments were well tolerated, but eventually, 7 of 8 children (88%) required high-efficacy DMT. DISCUSSION: In this pediatric cohort, 4% of patients with MOG-IgG met criteria for MS. The clinical-radiologic spectrum ranged from typical MS to overlapping MOGAD-MS, and patients usually required high-efficacy DMT.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Clinical Features of Children With MOG-IgG Who Fulfill Criteria of Multiple Sclerosis and Overlapping Disorders
- Date Crossref
- 01/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.