Comparative analysis of codon usage bias and host adaptation across avian metapneumovirus genotypes
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Avian metapneumovirus (aMPV) is a significant pathogen affecting poultry worldwide, causing respiratory disease and economic losses. This study investigated the genetic and evolutionary differences among aMPV genotypes through codon usage bias analysis. Using whole-genome and F gene sequences, we assessed phylogenetic relationships, codon usage patterns, evolutionary pressures, and host adaptation. Our results indicate clear genotype differentiation in the phylogenetic tree, with Group C identified as the earliest diverging lineage of aMPV. The F gene exhibits independent evolutionary trajectories, reflecting distinct selective pressures. Codon usage bias varies across genotypes and is primarily driven by selection pressure, with Groups B and C experiencing stronger selective constraints. The F gene, crucial for viral entry and adaptation, undergoes intense selection, optimising codon usage for host adaptation. Host adaptation analysis reveals that aMPV is most suited to chickens. Additionally, Group B exhibits the largest population size; however, recent declines, particularly in this genotype, suggest that vaccine-driven selection pressure may be influencing aMPV population dynamics. These findings provide critical insights into aMPV evolution, highlighting the role of codon usage bias and selection pressure in shaping viral adaptation. Understanding these evolutionary mechanisms may aid in vaccine development and disease control strategies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Comparative analysis of codon usage bias and host adaptation across avian metapneumovirus genotypes
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.