Unraveling the Genetic Architecture of Obesity: A Path to Personalized Medicine

Résumé fourni par la source

Obesity is a global health challenge characterized by significant heterogeneity in causes and treatment responses, complicating sustainable management. This narrative review explores the genomic architecture of obesity and its implications for personalized interventions, focusing on how genetic variations influence key biological pathways and treatment outcomes. A comprehensive literature search, guided by the authors’ expertise, was conducted to identify key publications on the genomics of obesity and personalized approaches. The selection of articles prioritized those that provided direct insights into the genomic basis of obesity and its potential for informing tailored strategies. Genomic studies reveal both monogenic and polygenic influences on obesity, identifying numerous susceptibility loci. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have linked common variants in genes like FTO and MC4R to increased BMI and appetite dysregulation, respectively. Epigenetic research highlights the role of DNA methylation and other modifications in gene–environment interactions. Genetic and polygenic risk scores (GRSs and PRSs) show potential for refining risk stratification and predicting treatment response. The gut microbiome and metabolome also contribute to obesity pathogenesis, offering novel targets for intervention. Personalized medicine offers significant potential for improving obesity management through tailored interventions based on an individual’s genetic and ‘omics’ profile. Future research should focus on elucidating the functional consequences of identified variants, exploring gene–environment interactions, and developing strategies to overcome current limitations in clinical translation. With continued advancements, precision medicine can enhance treatment efficacy, increase sustainability, and help reduce the global burden of obesity-related diseases.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.