Viral evolution prediction identifies broadly neutralizing antibodies to existing and prospective SARS-CoV-2 variants
Rattachement africain : cn, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain are used to treat and prevent COVID-19. However, the rapid evolution of SARS-CoV-2 drives continuous escape from therapeutic mAbs. Therefore, the ability to identify broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) to future variants is needed. Here we use deep mutational scanning to predict viral receptor-binding domain evolution and to select for mAbs neutralizing both existing and prospective variants. A retrospective analysis of 1,103 SARS-CoV-2 wild-type-elicited mAbs shows that this method can increase the probability of identifying effective bnAbs to the XBB.1.5 strain from 1% to 40% in an early pandemic set-up. Among these bnAbs, BD55-1205 showed potent activity to all tested variants. Cryogenic electron microscopy structural analyses revealed the receptor mimicry of BD55-1205, explaining its broad reactivity. Delivery of mRNA-lipid nanoparticles encoding BD55-1205-IgG in mice resulted in serum half-maximal neutralizing antibody titre values of ~5,000 to XBB.1.5, HK.3.1 and JN.1 variants. Combining bnAb identification using viral evolution prediction with the versatility of mRNA delivery technology can enable rapid development of next-generation antibody-based countermeasures against SARS-CoV-2 and potentially other pathogens with pandemic potential.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Viral evolution prediction identifies broadly neutralizing antibodies to existing and prospective SARS-CoV-2 variants
- Date Crossref
- 10/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.