Factors associated with plate fractures in mandibular reconstruction
Rattachement africain : au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mandibular plate fracture (MPF) is a serious complication of mandibular reconstruction, leading to postoperative morbidity and potential revision surgeries. Recently, there has been an increased utilization of virtual surgical planning (VSP) with patient-specific reconstruction plates to decrease operative time and improve postoperative outcomes. It is critical for surgeons performing mandibular reconstruction to have a comprehensive understanding of the contributing factors and strategies for minimizing the likelihood of MPF. RECENT FINDINGS: This review examines the patient-related and surgical factors contributing to MPF. The literature highlights that patient-related factors include younger age and degree of occlusion, while surgical factors include lateral mandibular defects, the absence of coronoidectomy, and the use of bridging plates without bony reconstruction. Notably, recent studies suggest a reduction in MPFs with the implementation of VSP and patient-specific reconstruction plates. SUMMARY: This review aims to inform surgeons about patients who are at increased risk of MPF following mandibular reconstruction, emphasizing the need for close monitoring. Furthermore, it underscores the additional benefits of VSP and patient-specific reconstruction plates in improving postoperative outcomes. However, further research is required to assess the long-term efficacy of these reconstruction plates.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Factors associated with plate fractures in mandibular reconstruction
- Date Crossref
- 05/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.