Explainable Recommendation Merging Sentiment Analysis and Multi-Scale Collaborative Filtering
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Recommender systems (RSs) based on collaborative filtering (CF) are often perceived as black-box models incapable of offering plausible explanations for recommended items. CF that combines methods such as deep learning mitigates this problem but explains only in terms of feature similarity, which neglects the user-item correlation and users’ real sentiment. In order to improve the explainability of CF models and the rationality of explanation, an explainable recommendation model merging sentiment analysis and multi-scale collaborative filtering (ERSA-MCF) is proposed in this paper. Specifically, we extend the scale of CF to implement filtering in three aspects: user acceptance, user preference, and item similarity, to increase the association between users and items. Simultaneously, the sentiment score of conformity ratings is introduced to mirror the user’s genuine receptiveness. In order to balance the recommended lists generated by the three filtering scales with accuracy, diversity, and explainability, a multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm based on a global optimal quality centroid (MPSO-GOC) is proposed for optimizing the candidate lists and improving the overall efficiency of the model. Experimental results show that the model improves diversity and explainability while ensuring accuracy.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Explainable Recommendation Merging Sentiment Analysis and Multi-Scale Collaborative Filtering
- Date Crossref
- 08/11/2024
- Éditeur
- IEEE
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.