Deep brain stimulation improves symptoms across all dimensions in treatment-resistant depression

Le résumé fourni par la source

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) reduces depressive symptom scores in many patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, it is unclear whether the observed improvement is similar across various symptom dimensions (e.g., anhedonia, anxiety, insomnia) or if some require additional clinical attention. Using a retrospective chart review, we assessed the trajectory of HAM-D-17 and MADRS scores during vALIC or slMFB DBS treatment within different symptom dimensions (HAM-D-17: 1) affective/anhedonia, 2) somatic/anxiety, 3) insomnia; MADRS: 1) affective/anhedonia, 2) anxiety/vegetative, 3) hopelessness) after at least a 25 ​% symptom reduction (partial response) at any time during their treatment course (n ​= ​34 for HAM-D-17, n ​= ​25 for MADRS). Results showed that each of the assessed symptom dimensions was significantly reduced compared to baseline at each of the assessed time periods (last follow-up: 2-15 years) after (partial) DBS response onset, which occurred at a median of approximately 2.5 months. Additionally, there was a significant interaction effect between symptom dimension and time period (HAM-D-17: F (12,1655.46) ​= ​5.46, p ​< ​0.001; MADRS: F (12,938.73) ​= ​2.40, p ​< ​0.01). Model coefficients indicated that insomnia symptoms (HAM-D-17) and anxiety/vegetative symptoms (MADRS) improved at a slower rate than the other symptom dimensions. Additionally, higher baseline scores in the HAM-D-17 somatic/anxiety dimension were significantly associated with a larger percentage reduction in overall symptoms after DBS (n ​= ​39, F (1,32) ​= ​12.371, p ​< ​0.01). Our findings demonstrate that DBS for TRD effectively treats depressive symptoms in all dimensions, although insomnia symptoms may improve at a slower rate, and that patients with more anxiety symptoms, who typically tend to have worse pharmacological treatment outcomes, may particularly benefit from DBS.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.