Clinico-Pathologic Profile of a Cohort of Patients with Actinic Keratosis in a Tertiary Center in Romania
Rattachement africain : ro, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Actinic keratosis (AK) is considered to be the most common form of in situ carcinoma and typically arises on skin that has been chronically exposed to ultraviolet radiation. The need for early diagnosis, using non-invasive methods, has allowed for a non-surgical approach to these conditions with a significant impact on the quality of life of patients. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 58 patients diagnosed with AK who underwent surgical excision at a tertiary center in Bucharest, Romania between 2018 and 2023. Clinical parameters (age, sex, lesion size, anatomical location, comorbidities) and histopathological variables (AK subtype, KIN grade, pleomorphism, solar elastosis, inflammatory infiltrate) were analyzed. Statistical associations between histological findings and clinical features were assessed using Fisher's exact test. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirmed a predominance of AK among elderly patients, with hypertrophic lesions and moderate dysplasia (KIN II) being most common. Higher KIN grades correlated significantly with more severe pleomorphism, solar elastosis, and inflammatory response, suggesting progressive UV-induced skin damage. The findings underscore the importance of clinicopathological correlation for risk stratification and support the integration of non-invasive diagnostic tools to improve early detection and management of AK.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Clinico-Pathologic Profile of a Cohort of Patients with Actinic Keratosis in a Tertiary Center in Romania
- Date Crossref
- 10/06/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.