Cold Stress Responses of Different Genotypes of Miscanthus Assessed by Relative Electrical Conductivity and LT50

Le résumé fourni par la source

We aim to provide a theoretical basis for improving the cold tolerance of Miscanthus spp., a widely recognized C4 perennial bioenergy crop, and extending its application in the industry. This study evaluated its cold tolerance by measuring the relative electrical conductivity (REC) of detached leaves. We calculated the half-lethal temperature (LT50) during non-acclimation and acclimation treatments in the 12 wild genotypes of M. sacchariflorus and M. lutarioriparius from different regions of China. In this study, five temperature treatments were carried out to simulate the natural early spring cold process, with temperatures of 0 °C, −4 °C, −8 °C, −12 °C, and−16 °C. We compared the REC and LT50 during the non-acclimation and acclimation treatments, and the results show that the REC of the 12 genotypes increased with a decrease in the treatment temperature, forming an S-shaped curve, which was significantly negatively correlated with the corresponding temperature. Under non-cold acclimation, the M. sacchariflorus B0111 from Jiamusi, Heilongjiang Province, had the lowest LT50 of −9.49 °C, showing extraordinarily strong cold tolerance. However, M. lutarioriparius A0630 from Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province, had the highest LT50 of −6.43 °C, demonstrating the weakest cold tolerance. After 21 days of cold acclimation, B0111 still exhibited the most substantial cold tolerance. While A0630 showed an enhanced cold tolerance, it remains the weakest in this study. The cold acclimation abilities of the 12 genotypes varied from −0.016 to 0.666 °C. Additionally, we found that the tolerance abilities of Miscanthus were enhanced after acclimation. Furthermore, its tolerance capacity was found to vary according to the geographic factor of its original location, which shows the significance of the correlation with latitude. However, there was no correlation found with altitude or longitude.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.