A Study to Assess the Knowledge Regarding Warning Signs of Cervical Cancer Among Women at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital, Kuppam
Le résumé fourni par la source
Cervical cancer remains a major public health concern, and early detection through awareness of warning signs is crucial for prevention. This study aimed to assess the knowledge regarding warning signs of cervical cancer among women at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Kuppam and identify factors influencing their knowledge levels. A quantitative approach with a descriptive cross-sectional design was employed. The study was conducted among 95 women, selected through a convenient sampling method. Data were collected using a self-structured questionnaire. The findings revealed that 42.1% of women had adequate knowledge, 26.3% had moderate knowledge, and 31.6% demonstrated inadequate knowledge. Statistically significant associations were found between knowledge levels and education (Chi Square = 30.304, p < 0.001), occupation (Chi Square = 40.557, p < 0.001), number of children (Chi Square = 23.453, p = 0.001), type of family (Chi Square = 12.157, p = 0.016), access to healthcare facilities (Chi Square = 14.803, p = 0.022), and source of health information (Chi Square = 24.3, p = 0.002). The study highlights a significant gap in knowledge. Targeted health education programs are essential to improve women's knowledge and promote early detection.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A Study to Assess the Knowledge Regarding Warning Signs of Cervical Cancer Among Women at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital, Kuppam
- Date Crossref
- 07/06/2025
- Éditeur
- International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.