Urine culture findings in well-appearing febrile infants aged 22–90 days with negative urinalysis
Rattachement africain : es, ie. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the appropriateness of the American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) recommendation to no longer collect a urine culture (UC) in febrile infants ≥21 days old with negative urinalysis, and to identify predictors for having a positive UC in well-appearing febrile infants aged 22-90 days with a negative urinalysis. METHODS: This study was a subanalysis of a multicentre retrospective registry, including well-appearing febrile infants aged 22-90 days with a negative urinalysis between 2011 and 2022. We performed a multivariate regression analysis including the following variables: age, sex, duration of fever, maximum temperature, absolute neutrophil count (ANC), and C reactive protein and procalcitonin levels. RESULTS: spp (24, 13.6%). Positive UCs were positively associated with male sex (OR 9.0; 95% CI 4.7 to 16.9) and ANC (OR 1.0001; 95% CI 1.00003 to 1.0002). CONCLUSION: Our findings support the AAP's recommendation to avoid obtaining a UC in female infants aged 22-90 days with a negative urinalysis. Blood tests demonstrated low performance in predicting a positive UC. This finding and the extremely low prevalence of circumcision in our setting suggest that most positive UCs in males with a negative urinalysis are more likely to represent contamination, as noted by the AAP.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Urine culture findings in well-appearing febrile infants aged 22–90 days with negative urinalysis
- Date Crossref
- 06/06/2025
- Éditeur
- BMJ
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.